All research
Communication Services Sector · Session Recap

Communication Services Edges Up as Narrow Breadth Limits Gains

The sector finished slightly higher on Tuesday even as fewer than half of its stocks advanced, while a low share of companies graded A or B kept pressure on the primary fund.

EasyAlpha Research · Oct 27, 2026 · Oct 27, 4:39 PM EDT

XLC logo

XLC · Communication Services Select Sector SPDR Fund

$103.57-0.3%

1 month

-6.8%

100 sessions

-7.3%

6 months

-10.2%

12 months

-11.6%

Open XLC as of Oct 27, 4:39 PM EDT

Session movers

  • SKYDSkydance Corporation

    +3.3%
  • CHTRCharter Communications Inc

    +2.7%
  • NFLXNetflix Inc

    -2.2%

The Communication Services sector leaned on narrow leadership to manage a quiet session on Tuesday, October 27, even as underlying breadth remained restrained. Only 42.1% of the sector's S&P 500 members advanced, while just 24.5% of the graded holdings in the Communication Services Select Sector SPDR Fund, an exchange-traded fund that trades under ticker XLC, sit in companies graded A or B. While the cap-weighted sector finished +0.1%, XLC closed -0.3% at $103.57, held back as Netflix Inc settled at -2.2%. That softness in major streaming and platform names followed ongoing market concern over weaker revenue guidance and reduced advertising growth, alongside investor caution around a record $97.5 billion financing plan for artificial intelligence infrastructure ahead of pivotal Big Tech earnings.

Across the broader market, 7 of the 11 sectors rose, leaving the sector's subdued showing near the back of the pack. The cap-weighted sector outpaced its equal-weighted counterpart, which held at 0.0%. When cap weighting outpaces equal weighting, the largest companies are doing more work than the median member. Gains did surface among individual members, with Skydance Corporation leading the sector at +3.3% and Charter Communications Inc following at +2.7%, but that strength proved insufficient to lift the wider fund.

The internal balance of the sector highlights why single-day moves can mask deeper structural vulnerabilities. EasyAlpha grades each company against its industry peers. Companies graded A or B have stronger fundamentals, and historically they have carried a lower risk of large drawdowns than companies graded D or E. In XLC, where EasyAlpha grades 85.9% of the portfolio, only 24.5% of that graded weight sits in companies graded A or B. That leaves the fund heavily weighted toward companies graded C, D, or E.

This quality profile arrives alongside persistent intermediate-term pressure. While XLC provides access to the sector at an expense ratio of 0.08%, the fund stands at -7.3% over the past 100 sessions. That intermediate-term pressure reflects ongoing caution over heavy financing requirements for artificial intelligence infrastructure and slowing growth across streaming entertainment. In an environment shaped by those demands, the sector's low share of companies graded A or B leaves it with little cushion.

Explore the Communication Services sector

Every company in it, graded, with where the quality actually sits.

Open the sector

How grades work

Every day we grade each company against the other companies in its sector, looking at its finances, how its stock trades, and what the market is signaling. The result is one simple letter.

  • AExcellent quality
  • BGood quality
  • CAverage quality
  • DBelow average
  • EWeakest quality
How grades work →

A grade measures quality against the other companies in a sector, from historical data. It is not a prediction, not a price target, and not advice. A company can be graded A and still fall.