Communication Services Trails Field as Telecom Pressure Weighs
The fund recorded a clear weekly decline as earnings revisions and wireless network headlines weighed on key holdings even as most sectors gained ground.
EasyAlpha Research · Oct 23, 2026 · Oct 24, 8:10 AM EDT
XLC · Communication Services
-4.4%this week
Communication Services retreated this week in a clear contrast with the rest of the market. Across the broader field, 8 of the 11 sector funds rose this week, highlighting that the sector's retreat occurred during an otherwise positive environment for equities. The Communication Services Select Sector SPDR Fund, an exchange-traded fund known by the ticker XLC, recorded a notable weekly decline to close -4.4%. By comparison, the broader market proved far steadier, with the S&P 500 finishing the week -0.4%.
Inside the sector, breadth tilted moderately negative, as 44.4% of the group's constituents managed to gain ground. The primary downward pull came from telecom and digital platform heavyweights, led by AT&T Inc., which ended the week -10.7%. That retreat began after AT&T reported quarterly results where its growth forecast disappointed analysts despite topping profit expectations. Pressure on the stock intensified later in the week following reports that SpaceX was seeking 80,000 cell sites to build a nationwide wireless network, which sparked renewed competitive anxiety across the telecom industry.
The gap between capitalization weighting and equal weighting reveals how the week unfolded across the sector. While XLC closed -4.4%, an equal-weighted basket of the sector's members recorded -0.9%. That notable difference highlights that weakness was heavily concentrated among the sector's largest components, rather than reflecting an across-the-board retreat among mid-sized and smaller members. When mega-cap holdings stumble, their oversized weight in the capitalization-weighted fund pulls the entire benchmark down, regardless of how stable the median constituent appears.
Those large-cap drags extended well beyond traditional telecommunications. Digital advertising and entertainment titans faced company-specific headwinds that compounded the pressure on XLC. Streaming bellwether Netflix also lost ground after lowering its full-year advertising revenue outlook and projecting a fourth consecutive quarter of moderating revenue growth. Together, those multi-hundred-billion-dollar holdings amplified the downside for the sector fund.
By contrast, Skydance Corporation led the sector's gainers, finishing the week +12.4%. The move followed speculation regarding a multi-billion-dollar investment tied to SpaceX, alongside subsequent reports pointing to an unconfirmed direct investment from Elon Musk. Yet while Skydance Corporation advanced, the contrast between the fund's return of -4.4% and the equal-weighted return of -0.9% shows that individual gains could not counterbalance the heavier drag from larger holdings like Netflix and AT&T.
Over longer windows, this notable weekly decline leaves XLC at -6.3% over the past month and -0.7% across the past three months. One difficult week rarely changes what a sector is, and this one did not alter the fundamental makeup of Communication Services. The sector remains divided between distinct business models: mature telecom utilities with high capital requirements and defensive cash profiles, balanced against asset-light internet platforms driven by digital ad budgets and content streaming. Headwinds from regulatory rumblings, competitive speculation, or quarterly guidance adjustments are common across both groups. While they produced a clear underperformance this week, they leave the structural drivers of the sector intact.
Explore the Communication Services sector
Every company in it, graded, with where the quality actually sits.
How grades work
Every day we grade each company against the other companies in its sector, looking at its finances, how its stock trades, and what the market is signaling. The result is one simple letter.
- AExcellent quality
- BGood quality
- CAverage quality
- DBelow average
- EWeakest quality
A grade measures quality against the other companies in a sector, from historical data. It is not a prediction, not a price target, and not advice. A company can be graded A and still fall.