Energy finishes +0.5% as heavyweights offset services drag
Higher crude prices lifted the sector, but narrow leadership masked a sharp slide in oilfield services and a portfolio low on top-tier quality.
EasyAlpha Research · Oct 28, 2026 · Oct 28, 4:39 PM EDT
XLE · Energy Select Sector SPDR Fund
$68.48+0.4%
1 month
+11.3%
100 sessions
+17.4%
6 months
+14.8%
12 months
-21.6%
Session movers
PSXPhillips 66
+1.9%XOMExxon Mobil Corp
+1.2%BKRBaker Hughes Co
-7.4%
The sector presents an uneasy split: only 19.7% of the graded assets in the Energy Select Sector SPDR Fund, an exchange-traded fund tracking the sector under the ticker XLE, sits in companies graded A or B. While 65.0% of the sector's S&P 500 members logged positive sessions on Wednesday, October 28, performance diverged modestly by market weight, as the cap-weighted sector ended +0.5% while an equal-weighted version closed -0.2%. Heavyweight producers and refiners carried the group, with Exxon Mobil Corp finishing +1.2% and Phillips 66 ending +1.9%, which offset a sharp slide in Baker Hughes Co, whose shares closed -7.4%. That modest sector advance followed higher crude benchmarks, driven by a reported refinery attack in Saudi Arabia and fighting in Yemen alongside an unexpected weekly drawdown in domestic crude inventories.
Crude prices moved upward on Wednesday as physical supply risks returned to the market. Tensions in the region rose after a reported attack on a Saudi refinery and renewed fighting in Yemen. Simultaneously, weekly industry figures revealed that crude stockpiles contracted by roughly two million barrels, running counter to expectations for a seasonal build. Those tightened supply dynamics supported crude futures and benefited large integrated producers and refining operations. Across the broader market, the sector placed among the gainers on a session where 6 of the 11 sectors rose.
While refining and integrated names benefited from higher commodity prices, Baker Hughes Co fell sharply following its third-quarter financial release. Investors looked past adjusted operating earnings to focus on elevated balance sheet leverage and lingering integration costs from recent acquisitions. The company also reported lower quarterly net income compared to the prior year. The retreat in Baker Hughes Co marked the session's steepest decline among sector members, contrasting with the gains recorded by the majority of its peers.
For investors using XLE to track the sector, the exchange-traded fund ended the session at $68.48, closing +0.4% on the day. With $39.1 billion in net assets and an expense ratio of 0.08%, the fund offers a low-cost vehicle for tracking the sector, though holding the broad basket means absorbing divergent individual outcomes. Over medium-term horizons, the fund has demonstrated solid momentum, standing at +11.3% over the past month and +17.4% over the past 100 sessions. Over the past twelve months, however, it sits at -21.6%.
EasyAlpha grades each company against its industry peers. Companies graded A or B have stronger fundamentals, and historically they have carried a lower risk of large drawdowns than companies graded D or E. In Energy, however, only a small portion of holdings meets that threshold. When more than four-fifths of the portfolio sits in lower quality tiers, headline gains driven by a handful of mega-caps can overshadow those historical fundamental differences.
Explore the Energy sector
Every company in it, graded, with where the quality actually sits.
How grades work
Every day we grade each company against the other companies in its sector, looking at its finances, how its stock trades, and what the market is signaling. The result is one simple letter.
- AExcellent quality
- BGood quality
- CAverage quality
- DBelow average
- EWeakest quality
A grade measures quality against the other companies in a sector, from historical data. It is not a prediction, not a price target, and not advice. A company can be graded A and still fall.