Energy Sector Lags as Refiners Weigh Down Upstream Gains
On a day when broader markets climbed, Energy finished slightly lower as weak refiners offset upstream gains and high-quality names remained scarce.
EasyAlpha Research · Oct 9, 2026 · Oct 9, 6:49 PM EDT
XLE · Energy Select Sector SPDR Fund
$65.09-0.2%
1 month
+0.2%
100 sessions
+6.2%
6 months
+14.0%
12 months
-25.8%
Session movers
TPLTexas Pacific Land Corporation
+1.0%APAAPA Corporation
+0.9%VLOValero Energy Corporation
-2.2%
Only 17.9% of the graded weight in Energy Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLE), an exchange-traded fund tracking the Energy sector, sits in companies graded A or B by EasyAlpha. On Friday, October 9, the sector closed -0.2% with narrow breadth, as only 38.1% of its members managed to rise. Weakness in refiners drove the retreat, led by Valero Energy Corporation at -2.2%, which offset gains from Texas Pacific Land Corporation at +1.0%. The split emerged as crude prices fluctuated between competing catalysts, with oil initially slipping after statements indicated the United States would not strike Iran.
Crude later recovered as Hurricane Isaias forced operators to shut in roughly 1.3 million barrels per day of Gulf of Mexico production. However, that commodity rebound failed to lift downstream refiners. Analysts cautioned that strong refining margins were already fully priced into share valuations. Separate reporting highlighted record upstream production and rising cash flow at Chevron.
The drag from refiners left the sector isolated on a day when 9 of the 11 sectors rose. Equal-weighted performance matched the cap-weighted result, with the equal-weighted sector recording -0.2%. That alignment confirms that weakness was spread across the industry rather than isolated to the largest integrated oil companies. Over longer windows, the fund stands at +6.2% over the past 100 sessions, even while sitting at -25.8% over the past year.
Companies graded A or B have stronger fundamentals, and historically they have carried a lower risk of large drawdowns than companies graded D or E. Because so little of the sector's graded weight qualifies for those top two tiers, most holdings reside in middle or lower grades where historical downside risk has been higher. For investors tracking the sector, the fund provides low-cost execution with an expense ratio of 0.08% across $41.4 billion in net assets, but that low fee does not alter the underlying quality mix.
Explore the Energy sector
Every company in it, graded, with where the quality actually sits.
How grades work
Every day we grade each company against the other companies in its sector, looking at its finances, how its stock trades, and what the market is signaling. The result is one simple letter.
- AExcellent quality
- BGood quality
- CAverage quality
- DBelow average
- EWeakest quality
A grade measures quality against the other companies in a sector, from historical data. It is not a prediction, not a price target, and not advice. A company can be graded A and still fall.