Financials Finish -1.9% as Wealth Managers Lead Losses
Narrow breadth and sharp declines in brokerage shares weighed on the sector on Tuesday, September 22, while higher quality holdings provided ballast.
EasyAlpha Research · Sep 22, 2026 · Sep 22, 6:41 PM EDTPlus
XLF · Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund
$54.79-2.0%
1 month
-4.7%
100 sessions
+5.1%
6 months
+11.2%
12 months
+1.5%
Session movers
AIGAmerican International Group Inc
+0.9%HOODRobinhood Markets Inc
+0.8%SCHWCharles Schwab Corp
-6.1%
The Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLF), an exchange-traded fund that tracks the sector, closed -2.0% on Tuesday, September 22 amid narrow participation, with only 9.7% of sector members advancing. While 62.3% of the fund's graded weight sits in companies graded A or B, heavy selling in the largest financial institutions drove the group down, pulling cap weighted sector performance to -1.9% compared to -1.7% for the equal weighted index. The decline accelerated as investors responded to concerns over artificial intelligence competition in wealth management alongside a flattening yield curve.
Charles Schwab Corp paced the decline, closing -6.1%. The wealth management firm faced heavy selling as investors reacted to potential artificial intelligence competition for financial advisory services alongside hawkish monetary policy guidance. Deal activity continued in corporate finance as Goldman Sachs invested $400 million in cybersecurity firm Cyera. Advancing shares were sparse and recorded modest changes: American International Group Inc closed +0.9%, while Robinhood Markets Inc closed +0.8%.
The drop came during a split market session where 5 of the 11 sectors rose. The pullback extends a weaker run, leaving XLF at -4.7% over the past month. Across longer holding periods, the fund remains positive, posting +5.1% over the medium term, +11.2% over six months, and +1.5% over the past twelve months.
EasyAlpha grades each company against its industry peers. Companies graded A or B have stronger fundamentals, and historically they have carried a lower risk of large drawdowns than companies graded D or E. Because 62.3% of the fund's graded weight sits in those top two tiers, the broader group retains structural quality even as short term interest rate uncertainty and technology shifts pressure individual business models.
Explore the Financials sector
Every company in it, graded, with where the quality actually sits.
How grades work
Every day we grade each company against the other companies in its sector, looking at its finances, how its stock trades, and what the market is signaling. The result is one simple letter.
- AExcellent quality
- BGood quality
- CAverage quality
- DBelow average
- EWeakest quality
A grade measures quality against the other companies in a sector, from historical data. It is not a prediction, not a price target, and not advice. A company can be graded A and still fall.