リサーチ一覧
素材セクター · セッション総括

Mining Slump Holds Back Materials Fund Despite Positive Breadth

Gold miners weighed on the sector after higher rate expectations lifted yields, offsetting gains across chemicals.

EasyAlpha Research · 2026年8月28日 · 8月31日 7:56 GMT-4Plus

XLBのロゴ

XLB · Materials Select Sector SPDR Fund

$53.18-0.1%

XLBを開く 8月31日 7:56 GMT-4 時点

セッションの変動銘柄

  • CTVACorteva Inc

    +1.8%
  • IFFInternational Flavors & Fragrances Inc

    +1.3%
  • NEMNewmont Goldcorp Corp

    -3.3%

The Materials Select Sector SPDR Fund, an exchange-traded fund trading under ticker XLB, slipped -0.1% on Friday, August 28 to close at $53.18. That quiet surface concealed a clear divergence: 57.7% of the sector's S&P 500 members posted gains, yet heavy selling in mining shares pulled the cap-weighted Materials group down -0.3%, while the equal-weighted sector fell only -0.1%. The drag centered on Newmont Goldcorp Corp (-3.3%), which overshadowed positive sessions from agricultural and chemical producers such as Corteva Inc (+1.8%) and International Flavors & Fragrances Inc (+1.3%).

The retreat in precious metals miners came after economic policy remarks warned that inflation remained too high and financial conditions were not sufficiently restrictive. Those comments increased expectations for additional interest rate hikes, which pushed the dollar and Treasury yields higher while pulling down gold and silver prices. The decline in precious metals hit mining companies directly, whereas agricultural and specialty chemical companies proved more resilient during the session.

The session played out in a broader market where 5 of the 11 sectors rose. Despite the modest slip on Friday, August 28, XLB has risen +3.0% over the past month. Across its $8.3 billion in assets, the fund charges an expense ratio of 0.08%, providing an inexpensive way to track the sector when heavyweights and smaller constituents diverge.

Quality across the sector remains mixed. Every day EasyAlpha grades each company against its industry peers, placing each stock into a tier from A down to E. Across Materials, 45.1% of the fund's graded weight sits in companies graded A or B. Historically, companies graded A or B have maintained stronger fundamentals and carried a lower risk of large drawdowns than companies graded D or E, while the remainder of the fund sits in average or lower-tier ratings.

素材セクターを見る

そのセクターの全企業を評価付きで、質がどこにあるかとともに。

セクターを開く

グレードの仕組み

毎日、各企業を同じセクターの他社と比較して評価しています。財務、株価の動き、市場のシグナルを見て、結果をシンプルな一文字で表します。

  • A非常に優れた品質
  • B良い品質
  • C平均的な品質
  • D平均以下
  • E最も弱い品質
評価の仕組み →

評価は過去のデータをもとに、同じセクターの他社と比べた質を示すものです。予測でも目標株価でも助言でもありません。A評価の企業でも下落することがあります。