Utilities Fall as Rising Yields and PG&E Weigh on Sector
Rising Treasury yields pressured utilities while PG&E fell sharply on a California wildfire liability setback, leaving only a fraction of the sector in positive territory.
EasyAlpha Research · 2026年8月28日 · 8月31日 7:57 GMT-4Plus
XLU · Utilities Select Sector SPDR Fund
$42.73-1.0%
セッションの変動銘柄
AWKAmerican Water Works
+1.2%EDConsolidated Edison Inc
+0.8%PCGPG&E Corp
-7.5%
On Friday, August 28, breadth across the Utilities sector collapsed as only 6.5% of its member companies advanced. The exchange-traded fund Utilities Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLU) dropped -1.0% to close at $42.73. The cap-weighted sector fell -1.0%, matching the equal-weighted drop of -1.0%. That alignment shows that selling was uniform across companies of all sizes rather than concentrated in a few large holdings. The broad-based retreat followed hawkish remarks signaling that borrowing costs could stay higher for longer, which pushed bond yields upward and reduced the relative appeal of dividend-yielding equities.
PG&E Corp (-7.5%) delivered the sector's steepest decline. The California power provider tumbled after state lawmakers blocked proposed wildfire liability reforms that would have restricted insurers from pursuing subrogation claims against utilities. The legislative setback left the company facing ongoing exposure to substantial wildfire-related liabilities, compounding the wider pressure on power companies from rising Treasury yields.
Gains were sparse across the sector, with only regulated water and electricity providers finding modest support. American Water Works (+1.2%) led the handful of advancers, followed by Consolidated Edison Inc (+0.7%). The group lagged the broader market, where 5 of the 11 sectors rose. Over the past month, XLU is down -4.3%.
For investors using Utilities Select Sector SPDR Fund as their vehicle for the sector, the fund manages $23.1 billion with an expense ratio of 0.08%. EasyAlpha grades each company against its industry peers. Across the fund's graded holdings, 26.8% carries grades of A or B. Historically, companies graded A or B show stronger fundamentals and a lower risk of large drawdowns than those graded D or E. That leaves the majority of the fund concentrated in companies with average or below-average peer standing.
公益事業セクターを見る
そのセクターの全企業を評価付きで、質がどこにあるかとともに。
グレードの仕組み
毎日、各企業を同じセクターの他社と比較して評価しています。財務、株価の動き、市場のシグナルを見て、結果をシンプルな一文字で表します。
- A非常に優れた品質
- B良い品質
- C平均的な品質
- D平均以下
- E最も弱い品質
評価は過去のデータをもとに、同じセクターの他社と比べた質を示すものです。予測でも目標株価でも助言でもありません。A評価の企業でも下落することがあります。